Infographic
LegalStories Learning Map
A practical breakdown of doctrine complexity, model-question coverage, and expert-evaluated difficulty in the LegalStories dataset.
Doctrines
294
Avg definition length
162.2 words
Sampled subset
101
Expert subset
20
Complexity balance
Doctrine tiers by definition length
Foundational98 (33%)
Intermediate98 (33%)
Advanced98 (33%)
Question design
Coverage across question types
Concept comprehension882
Scenario prediction882
Limitation / exception882
Model output profile
Story length and doctrine coverage by model
GPT-4-0613
294 doctrines
Avg story length: 291.0 words. Question coverage: 294/294/294
GPT-3.5-turbo-0613
294 doctrines
Avg story length: 290.6 words. Question coverage: 294/294/294
LLaMA-2
294 doctrines
Avg story length: 328.1 words. Question coverage: 294/294/294
Challenging concepts
Longest doctrine definitions in corpus
Basic structure doctrine673 words
Human rights521 words
Major questions doctrine521 words
Reasonable person511 words
Frustration of purpose510 words
Consideration473 words
Necessity (criminal law)467 words
Undue influence452 words
Expert 20-doctrine subset difficulty: easy 7, medium 10, hard 3.
Counterbench angle
How this becomes product + content
Use doctrine tiers to scaffold legal-literacy onboarding tracks for new users and law-adjacent teams.
Keep question-type mixes explicit so teams can balance comprehension, transfer, and edge-case reasoning.
Tie model choice to curriculum expectations rather than abstract model benchmarks.