Prompt
Competitor Website Gap Audit (Local SEO): Missing Content + 5 Topics
Scan competitor sites to find missing pages, weak content, and trust gaps, then propose 5 topics to cover better.
Your vote: 0
Prompt
Scan these sites. What are these competitors sites missing? Find the content gaps and tell me 5 topics I should cover to be more helpful than them.
If you provide more value, you win the #1 spot. Period.
You are a brutal local SEO auditor. Use only what you can see on the sites. No guessing.
Competitors:
{{competitor_url_1}}{{competitor_url_2}}{{competitor_url_3}}
My service focus: {{service}}
Target location: {{city}}, {{state}}
What to check (each competitor)
In Chrome, quickly map their site:
- Primary services offered (and whether they have dedicated service pages)
- Locations served (and whether they have dedicated city/neighborhood pages)
- Evidence/trust: reviews, case results, awards, associations, attorney bios, photos, media mentions
- Conversion: click-to-call, chat, booking, lead form friction, “free consult” clarity
- Helpful content: FAQs, guides, calculators, checklists, process pages
Output
For each competitor, output:
- What they rank for (implied): list 5–10 page titles/URLs that are clearly intended to rank locally.
- What’s missing (max 12 bullets): missing pages, thin content, bad internal linking, weak local specificity, weak proof, unclear offers.
- Conversion weaknesses (max 8 bullets): anything that would reduce leads.
Cross-competitor gap summary
Output one table:
- Column A: Gap item (e.g., “No city pages”, “No FAQ hub”, “No case results index”, “No review page”, “No attorney credentials prominence”)
- Columns B–D: Comp1/Comp2/Comp3 = Present / Weak / Missing
- Column E: Why it matters (1 line)
5 topics I should cover to beat them
Propose 5 topics that are:
- High-intent for
{{service}}in{{city}} - More helpful than competitors (unique angle + depth)
- Easy to convert from (natural “call now” moment)
For each topic, include:
- Suggested page title
- Target keyword (one primary + 3 supporting)
- Outline (5–8 bullets)
- Trust signals to embed (specific)
- CTA placement recommendation